From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Target Graphics Inc. v. Deutsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 2001
282 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted March 7, 2001.

April 16, 2001.

In two related actions to recover damages for breach of contract, Ellen Deutsch, a defendant in both Actions, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), entered April 12, 2000, which denied her motion to consolidate Action No. 1 with Action No. 2.

Wechsler Bursky Cohen, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Robert M. Bursky of counsel), for appellant in both Actions.

Robert B. Pollack, East Meadow, N.Y., and Steven P. Herman, Westbury, N.Y., for plaintiff-respondent in Action No. 1 (one brief filed).

Braverman Warfield, LLP, New Hyde Park, N.Y. (Christine Lombardi of counsel), for respondents in Action No. 2.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion to consolidate. Although there are some common issues of law and fact, the actions arise out of different transactions and different claims by the respective plaintiffs (see, CPLR 602[a]; D'Abreau v. American Bankers Ins. Co. of Fl., 261 A.D.2d 501; Stephens v. Allstate Ins. Co., 185 A.D.2d 338).

O'BRIEN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, GOLDSTEIN and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Target Graphics Inc. v. Deutsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 2001
282 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Target Graphics Inc. v. Deutsch

Case Details

Full title:Target Graphics Inc., plaintiff-respondent, v. Ellen Deutsch, appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 16, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
723 N.Y.S.2d 380

Citing Cases

Village of Mamaroneck v. Mamaroneck Affordable

Moreover, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to…

Trahan v. Galea

Here, and despite the presence of certain common issues ( Glussi v. Fortune Brands, Inc., 276 AD2d 586), the…