From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tarascio v. Tarascio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 26, 1992
183 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

May 26, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the combined annual total child support to $7,255.33, and adding thereto a provision adjusting the combined annual total child support to $8,555.32 upon termination of maintenance to the plaintiff; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for entry of an appropriate amended judgment.

Contrary to the husband's contention, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding the wife $4,000 as her equitable share of an Oldsmobile automobile valued at $19,000, which remains in the husband's possession. Furthermore, the court properly directed the husband to pay the marital debts.

We find, however, that the court, in computing the husband's income to determine the basic child support obligation, neglected to reduce the husband's income by the amount of maintenance to be paid to the wife pursuant to the judgment of divorce (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [b] [5] [vii] [C]).

It was not an improvident exercise of discretion for the court to award the wife approximately one half of her attorneys' fees considering her inability to pay the entire cost of her legal representation and that some of her legal fees were incurred because the husband failed to comply with a prior order of the court (see, Ginsberg v. Ginsberg, 164 A.D.2d 906; Denholz v Denholz, 147 A.D.2d 522). Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tarascio v. Tarascio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 26, 1992
183 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Tarascio v. Tarascio

Case Details

Full title:CAROL L. TARASCIO, Respondent, v. JOSEPH M. TARASCIO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 26, 1992

Citations

183 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
585 N.Y.S.2d 59

Citing Cases

Saasto v. Saasto

The trial court also properly ordered the defendant to pay $30,000 to the plaintiff's counsel. The…

Polychronopoulos v. Polychronopoulos

The court's deductions for FICA and other "allowable deductions" do not explain why the defendant is being…