From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tarantino v. Allentown State Hospital

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 19, 1974
16 Pa. Commw. 133 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1974)

Summary

finding the DPW is an arm of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Summary of this case from EADDY v. PA DEPT. OF PUB. WELFARE BERKS CTY. ASSISTANCE OFF

Opinion

Argued December 5, 1974

December 19, 1974.

Sovereign immunity — Constitution of Pennsylvania, Article I, Section 11 — Wrongful death and survival actions — State agencies.

1. Under Article I, Section 11 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, the Commonwealth and its agencies may not be sued without the consent of the Commonwealth, and wrongful death and survival actions brought against the Department of Public Welfare and a state hospital are within such prohibition. [134-5]

Argued December 5, 1974, before Judges KRAMER, WILKINSON, JR. and ROGERS, sittting as a panel of three.

Original jurisdiction, No. 396 C.D. 1974, in case of Joseph M. Tarantino, Administrator of the Estate of Janice A. Tarantino, deceased, v. Allentown State Hospital, Department of Public Welfare, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Complaint in trespass in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania seeking damages under wrongful death and survival theories. Preliminary objections filed by defendant. Held: Preliminary objections sustained. Complaint dismissed.

Rodney D. Henry, for plaintiff.

Allen C. Warshaw, Deputy Attorney General, with him Lawrence Silver, Deputy Attorney General, and Israel Packel, Attorney General, for defendants.


Plaintiff Joseph M. Tarantino, administrator of the estate of Janice A. Tarantino, deceased, has filed wrongful death and survival actions against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Department of Public Welfare and the Allentown State Hospital charging the defendants with negligent and improper treatment of his decedent at Allentown State Hospital. At issue are the defendants' preliminary objections grounded on sovereign immunity.

The complaint must be dismissed. We may not entertain suits against the Commonwealth and its agencies without the consent of the Commonwealth. Pa. Const. Art. I, § 11 (1968); Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 454 Pa. 179, 301 A.2d 849 (1973). The Department of Public Welfare and the Allentown State Hospital, as defendants, are clearly within the scope of constitutional interdiction. McCoy v. Commonwealth, 9 Pa. Commw. 107, 305 A.2d 746 (1973), aff'd per curiam, 457 Pa. 513, 326 A.2d 396 (1974). As we have repeatedly written, most recently in Hart v. Spectrum Arena, Inc., 15 Pa. Commw. 584, 329 A.2d 311 (1974), this court is without power to set aside the Constitution and superior appellate authority.

Williams v. Commonwealth, 12 Pa. Commw. 384, 316 A.2d 685 (1974); Duquesne Light Company v. Department of Transportation, 6 Pa. Commw. 364, 295 A.2d 351 (1972).

The defendants' preliminary objections are sustained and the complaint dismissed.


Summaries of

Tarantino v. Allentown State Hospital

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 19, 1974
16 Pa. Commw. 133 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1974)

finding the DPW is an arm of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Summary of this case from EADDY v. PA DEPT. OF PUB. WELFARE BERKS CTY. ASSISTANCE OFF
Case details for

Tarantino v. Allentown State Hospital

Case Details

Full title:Joseph M. Tarantino, Administrator of the Estate of Janice A. Tarantino…

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 19, 1974

Citations

16 Pa. Commw. 133 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1974)
329 A.2d 291

Citing Cases

Walter v. Commonwealth

We reject plaintiffs' suggestion that the doctrine of sovereign immunity should be judicially abrogated as an…

Tarantino v. Allentown State Hospital

Decided January 29, 1976. Appeal from the Commonwealth Court, No. 396 C.D. 1974, 16 Pa. Commw. 133, 329 A.2d…