From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tanner v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia
Nov 29, 1971
184 S.E.2d 745 (Va. 1971)

Opinion

42590 Record No. 7696.

November 29, 1971

Present, All the Justices.

Criminal Procedure — Evidence — Answers Not Responsive.

Unresponsive answers to questions asked rebuttal witness by prosecutor after defendant had placed his character in issue were not properly admissible as evidence.

Error to a judgment of the Court of Hustings for the City of Portsmouth. Hon. R. Winston Bain, judge presiding.

Reversed and remanded.

Melvin J. Radin (Robert Epstein, on brief), for plaintiff in error.

Gilbert W. Haith, Assistant Attorney General (Andrew P. Miller, Attorney General, on brief), for defendant in error.


Russell Tanner appeals his conviction of taking indecent liberties with a child in violation of Code Sec. 18.1-215.

At Tanner's trial, the defense placed his character in issue by bringing forth evidence of his good reputation in the community. The Commonwealth's Attorney subsequently called a rebuttal witness, who testified as follows:

"Q Do you know his reputation in the community for peaceableness?

"A Well, all the time I have known Mr. Tanner, he's been guilty of having little ones around him.

[Defense counsel then objected and moved for a mistrial. The court overruled the motion.]

"Q I would like to ask if you know the reputation of the defendant in the community for truth and veracity and peaceableness?

"A only with the children. That's all I know.

"Q You know of his reputation?

"A Just being with the children. That's all I know.

[Defense counsel again objected and moved for a mistrial. The court overruled the motion.]

"Q There are some questions — things you can't go into.

"THE COURT: The only thing I want her to do is say yes or no, if he has a reputation?

"A As far as I know, I know he doesn't have a good reputation simply because of the children."

This witness's answers, which were not responsive to the questions asked, were not properly admissible as evidence. Because the answers may have prejudiced the defendant, we reverse the conviction and remand the case for a new trial if the Commonwealth be so advised.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Tanner v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia
Nov 29, 1971
184 S.E.2d 745 (Va. 1971)
Case details for

Tanner v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL TANNER v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Court:Supreme Court of Virginia

Date published: Nov 29, 1971

Citations

184 S.E.2d 745 (Va. 1971)
184 S.E.2d 745

Citing Cases

Peerless Ins. Co. v. St. Laurent

Commonwealth v. White, 11 Cush. (Mass.) 483; Regina v. Riley, 14 Eng. L. Eq. 544; Griggs v. State, 58 Ala.…