From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tannenbaum v. New York

U.S.
Jun 12, 1967
388 U.S. 439 (1967)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.

No. 993.

Decided June 12, 1967.

18 N.Y.2d 268, 220 N.E.2d 783, appeal dismissed.

Osmond K. Fraenkel and Stanley Fleishman for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan for appellee.

Horace S. Manges for the American Book Publishers Council, Inc., as amicus curiae, in support of appellant.


The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed as moot.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN would reverse the judgment of the lower court.


I dissent from the dismissal of this appeal as moot for the reasons stated in my dissent in Jacobs v. New York, ante, p. 431. In my view, the question presented by this case is extremely important and requires a decision on the merits by this Court. I would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents. (See dissent set forth in Jacobs v. New York, ante, at 436.)


Summaries of

Tannenbaum v. New York

U.S.
Jun 12, 1967
388 U.S. 439 (1967)
Case details for

Tannenbaum v. New York

Case Details

Full title:TANNENBAUM v . NEW YORK

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 12, 1967

Citations

388 U.S. 439 (1967)

Citing Cases

Ginsberg v. New York

See Fiswick v. United States, 329 U.S. 211, 220-222. We were not able to reach that conclusion in Tannenbaum…

Spencer v. Kemna

See also Fiswick v. United States, 329 U.S. 211, 221-223 (1946) (conviction rendered petitioner liable to…