From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tamir v. Lamb

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1981
424 N.E.2d 556 (N.Y. 1981)

Summary

reversing trial court determination granting sum of money owed under agreement with two of three purported partners, where there was no evidence presented that partner who has not entered into the agreement was involved in or had any knowledge of the agreement or that the partnership derived any benefit from the agreement

Summary of this case from Don v. Singer

Opinion

Submitted April 30, 1981

Decided June 2, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, STEVEN B. DEROUNIAN, J.

Bernard Fremont for appellant.

Irwin M. Miller and Mary Ellen Cirrito for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 75 A.D.2d 810).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Tamir v. Lamb

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1981
424 N.E.2d 556 (N.Y. 1981)

reversing trial court determination granting sum of money owed under agreement with two of three purported partners, where there was no evidence presented that partner who has not entered into the agreement was involved in or had any knowledge of the agreement or that the partnership derived any benefit from the agreement

Summary of this case from Don v. Singer
Case details for

Tamir v. Lamb

Case Details

Full title:JOEL TAMIR, Appellant, v. EMANUEL LAMB et al., Doing Business as THE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 2, 1981

Citations

424 N.E.2d 556 (N.Y. 1981)
424 N.E.2d 556
441 N.Y.S.2d 669

Citing Cases

Whalen v. Gerzof

Moreover, the assignment by Gerzof to plaintiff, even if found valid, did not entitle her to participate in…

Don v. Singer

Moreover, to the extent it is alleged that Junger and Rosner were Singer's partners, that they agreed to the…