From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taksen v. Kramer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1933
239 App. Div. 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

March, 1933.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Monroe County.


At the time of the instant transaction defendant Dollinger was concededly an infant. It is elementary in this State that an infant may be held civilly liable for damages caused by his tortious acts. The complaint sufficiently alleges that defendant Kramer, operating the automobile in the presence of defendant Dollinger and under and pursuant to his authority, direction and control, willfully, maliciously and negligently struck the plaintiff causing him injury. Defendant Kramer in so acting not only subjected himself to liability but also acted as the alter ego of defendant Dollinger. It is as if defendant Dollinger had acted himself and the complaint is good. ( Robbins v. Mount, 33 How. Pr. 24; Sikes v. Johnson, 16 Mass. 389.) All concur. Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Taksen v. Kramer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1933
239 App. Div. 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Taksen v. Kramer

Case Details

Full title:ISADORE TAKSEN, Appellant, v. ALLYN KRAMER, Defendant, Impleaded with…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1933

Citations

239 App. Div. 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Citing Cases

United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Jones

In Woodson v. Hare (1944), 244 Ala. 301, 13 So.2d 172, the Court said: "Where a permissive user of an…

Tatlock v. Nathanson

In acting through the instrumentality of Simon, Richard made the acts of Simon legally and factually his own.…