From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taddeo-Amendola v. 970 Assets

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 2010
72 A.D.3d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-07718.

April 6, 2010.

In an action, inter alia, to recover for property damage, the defendants 970 Assets, LLC, Sharon Cohen, Century Development of NY, Inc., and Glenwood Assets, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Mayersohn, J.), dated June 26, 2009, which granted the plaintiffs' motion for leave to enter a judgment against them upon their failure to answer the complaint, and denied their cross motion to vacate their default in answering the complaint and to compel the plaintiffs to accept their untimely answer.

Behnam Kahen, Flushing, N.Y., for appellants.

Cassisi Cassisi, P.C. (Shayne, Dachs, Corker, Sauer Dachs, LLP, Mineola, N.Y. [Jonathan A. Dachs], of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Covello, Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

"A defendant seeking to vacate a default in answering a complaint must demonstrate a justifiable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense to the action ( see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Caputo v Peton, 13 AD3d 474; Glibbery v Cosenza Assoc., 4 AD3d 393)" ( Fekete v Camp Skwere, 16 AD3d 544, 545). Here, the appellants failed to do either.


Summaries of

Taddeo-Amendola v. 970 Assets

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 2010
72 A.D.3d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Taddeo-Amendola v. 970 Assets

Case Details

Full title:CARMINA TADDEO-AMENDOLA et al., Respondent, v. 970 ASSETS, LLC, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 6, 2010

Citations

72 A.D.3d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 2943
897 N.Y.S.2d 642

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Raghoo

A defendant seeking to vacate a default in answering a complaint and to compel the plaintiff to accept an…

U.S. Bank v. Dedomenico

A defendant seeking to vacate a default in answering a complaint and to compel the plaintiff to accept an…