criticizing unnecessary cross-appeals but nonetheless concluding that "the propriety of the argument" raised still may be considered
Summary of this case from Resolution Trust Corp. v. MaplewoodNo. 87-828.
February 29, 1988.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 53. Reported below: 823 F. 2d 1073.
criticizing unnecessary cross-appeals but nonetheless concluding that "the propriety of the argument" raised still may be considered
Summary of this case from Resolution Trust Corp. v. Maplewoodexplaining that while a defendant remains at risk when a case has been dismissed without prejudiced, a dismissal with prejudice "enables the defendant to say that he has 'prevailed'"
Summary of this case from C&K Nuco, LLC v. Expedited Freightways, LLCimposing sanctions for failing to reveal to court contrary controlling authority
Summary of this case from Moses v. MartinFull title:SZABO FOOD SERVICE, INC., ET AL. v. CANTEEN CORP
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 29, 1988
Courts that accept the crashworthiness doctrine for automobiles have also applied the same concept to…
Gerald Metals Inc. v. U.S.Determination at 30 (Views of Chairman Watson, dissenting) (List 1, Doc. 106). Plaintiff relies on USX Corp.…