holding that the "state must affirmatively act to curtail the individual's freedom such that he or she can no longer care for him or herself"
Summary of this case from Valdez v. RoybalNo. 95-5802.
June 11, 1996.
D.N.J., Bassler, J., 905 F.Supp. 198.
AFFIRMED
holding that the "state must affirmatively act to curtail the individual's freedom such that he or she can no longer care for him or herself"
Summary of this case from Valdez v. Roybalholding that the “state must affirmatively act to curtail the individual's freedom such that he or she can no longer care for him or herself.”
Summary of this case from Green v. Chester Upland Sch. Dist.finding no special relationship where Regalbuto "was [allegedly] deprived of his ability to seek alternative sources of aid because the dispatcher repeatedly assured the callers [to the 911 system] that help was on the way"
Summary of this case from Badway v. City of Philadelphiadismissing the police and fire departments "because they are not separate legal entities that can be sued"
Summary of this case from Doe v. Old Forge BoroughFull title:System Council T-3 of Intern. Broth. of Elec. Workers v. American Tel. and…
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Date published: Jun 11, 1996
Civil Action 93-02125, W.D.Pa. On June 28, 1996, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit established in…
Estate of Perez v. City of PhiladelphiaAssurances of help from a 911 operator do not establish a special relationship that places an affirmative…