From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Syracuse Transit Corporation v. Girard Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 5, 1943
266 App. Div. 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Opinion

May 5, 1943.

Present — Crosby, P.J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris, and McCurn, JJ.


Submission dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: While it is true that a corporation may, in some circumstances, purchase and own its own stock, it may not do so to the detriment of creditors. In any case it may not purchase its own stock with any of its funds except surplus. (Penal Law, § 664, subd. 5; McGill Co. v. Underwood, 161 App. Div. 30; Moses v. Soule, 63 Misc. 203, affd. 136 App. Div. 904.) The agreed statement of facts does not inform us that plaintiff used only surplus in acquiring ownership of its own stock; and we have no assurance from the record that there are not creditors of the plaintiff whose rights are involved. We think the case of Wood v. City of Salamanca ( 289 N.Y. 279) compels us to dismiss the proceeding. All concur. (Submission of controversy on an agreed statement of facts in an action for a declaratory judgment construing a trust indenture.)


Summaries of

Syracuse Transit Corporation v. Girard Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 5, 1943
266 App. Div. 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)
Case details for

Syracuse Transit Corporation v. Girard Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:SYRACUSE TRANSIT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. GIRARD TRUST COMPANY, Defendant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 5, 1943

Citations

266 App. Div. 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Citing Cases

In re Dawson Brothers Construction Co.

N.Y.Penal Law, Sec. 664, and the cases cited below are ample authority for the above statements. See also…