From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sykes v. City of Indianapolis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
May 9, 2012
1:12-CV-344-JMS-DKL (S.D. Ind. May. 9, 2012)

Opinion

1:12-CV-344-JMS-DKL

05-09-2012

SYLVESTER B. NICE SYKES, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, Defendant.


Entry Directing Further Proceedings

Mr. Sylvester B. Nice Sykes has filed a collection of documents from which it appears that he believes the Indianapolis Police Department is preventing him from doing his "lifework and getting back [his] indipindenece." See dkts. 1, 4, 6-10. This collection of documents, however, does not constitute a complaint. Accordingly, it presents nothing for the court to act upon except recognizing that Mr. Sykes may believe otherwise.

If Mr. Sykes wishes to file a lawsuit, he must file a complaint. In re Allied Signal Corp., 915 F.2d 190, 192 (6th Cir. 1990) ("an action is commenced with the filing of a complaint rather than a motion"); 1 James Wm. Moore et al., MOORE'S FEDERAL PRACTICE § 3.02[1] (3d ed.2000) ("an action is not commenced by . . . filing a motion with the court . . . .").

If Mr. Sykes files a complaint, he shall be guided by the following: (a) the complaint shall comply with the requirement of Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that pleadings contain "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. . . ."; (b) the complaint shall comply with the requirement of Rule 10 that the allegations in a complaint be made in numbered paragraphs, each of which should recite, as far as practicable, only a single set of circumstances; (c) the complaint must identify what legal injury he claims to have suffered and what persons are responsible for each such legal injury; and (d) the complaint shall contain a clear statement of the relief which is sought.

If a complaint is submitted as directed in the preceding paragraph, Mr. Sykes should place the above cause number on it and the court will direct its further processing as warranted. If no complaint is filed by May 31, 2012, the court will order the clerk to administratively close this action.

In addition, Mr. Sykes' motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [2] is granted. His motion for hearing [5] and motion for subpoenas [11] are denied as premature.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge

United States District Court

Southern District of Indiana

Distribution:

SYLVESTER B. NICE SYKES

837 Jefferson Ave.

Indianapolis, IN 46201


Summaries of

Sykes v. City of Indianapolis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
May 9, 2012
1:12-CV-344-JMS-DKL (S.D. Ind. May. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Sykes v. City of Indianapolis

Case Details

Full title:SYLVESTER B. NICE SYKES, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Date published: May 9, 2012

Citations

1:12-CV-344-JMS-DKL (S.D. Ind. May. 9, 2012)