From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Syed v. Fedor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 2003
302 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-08944

Submitted January 8, 2003.

February 13, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered April 11, 2002, which denied his motion, in effect, for leave to reargue a prior motion to restore the action, which was denied in an order of the same court, entered December 7, 2001.

Brody, O'Connor O'Connor, Northport, N.Y. (Scott A. Brody of counsel), for appellant.

William M. Mooney III, Corporation Counsel, Yonkers, N.Y. (Sean Booher of counsel), for respondents.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiff's motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue the prior motion, was not based on new facts which were unavailable at the time of the original motion. Therefore, the motion was actually one for leave to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable (see Lopez v. Lincoln Appliances, Bedding Furniture, 300 A.D.2d 451 [2d Dept. Dec. 16, 2002]; Aloi v. Silipo Welding, 293 A.D.2d 504, 505; Quinn v. Menzel, 282 A.D.2d 513).

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Syed v. Fedor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 2003
302 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Syed v. Fedor

Case Details

Full title:HUSAN SYED, appellant, v. RICHARD FEDOR, ET AL., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 13, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 750

Citing Cases

Cunningham v. Diers

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the respondents. The order denying the appellant's…

Cronin v. Chelsea Assoc

The plaintiff's second motion, which was denominated as one pursuant to CPLR 2221 to vacate, was identical to…