From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sydleman v. Benson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 13, 1985
463 So. 2d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-377.

February 13, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Indian River County, William L. Hendry, J.

J. Blayne Jennings of Law Office of J. Blayne Jennings, Gifford, for appellant.

Everett J. VanGaasbeck of Moss, Henderson Lloyd, Vero Beach, and Marjorie Gadarian Graham of Jones Foster, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.


We affirm the final judgment and write only to express concern as to the trial court's action in rejecting appellant's challenge for cause of two jurors who had been patients of a physician-expert witness called by the appellee doctor. Upon review of the entire colloquy between the jurors, the judge and the lawyers, we conclude that the judge acted within his discretion in denying the challenge for cause. General Foods Corp. v. Brown, 419 So.2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). However, the impartiality of the finders of fact is an absolute prerequisite to our system of justice. Close cases should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving a doubt as to his or her impartiality.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and DOWNEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sydleman v. Benson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 13, 1985
463 So. 2d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Sydleman v. Benson

Case Details

Full title:MARY ANN SYDLEMAN, APPELLANT, v. DANIEL W. BENSON, M.D., AND FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 13, 1985

Citations

463 So. 2d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Hill v. State

Close cases should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving doubt as to his or her…

Williams v. State

Because impartiality of the finders of fact is an absolute prerequisite to our system of justice, we have…