From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swindall v. State Election Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 25, 1923
219 P. 911 (Okla. 1923)

Opinion

No. 14230

Opinion Filed September 25, 1923. Rehearing Denied November 6, 1923.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Dismissal — Moot Questions.

When an injunction suit is filed in the district court and judgment rendered against plaintiff, and pending appeal in this court, the action sought to be enjoined has been performed and no particular relief can be afforded plaintiff in action, the issues in this court are abstract and hypothetical and the case becomes moot, and, under such circumstances, the appeal will be dismissed.

Error from District Court, Woodward County.

Action by Charles Swindall against the State Election Board and M.C. Garber. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error. Dismissed.

Swindall Wybrant, C.B. Leedy, Perry Morris, H.L. Adkins, and John A. Barry, for plaintiff in error.

Simons, McKnight Simons and W.H. Mills, for defendants in error.


This is an action to enjoin the State Election Board from placing the name of the defendant in error, Garber, on the official ballot as a candidate for Congress in the general election held in November, 1922.

A demurrer was sustained to the petition in the court below, and the plaintiff in error elected to stand on his petition, whereupon the case was dismissed and plaintiff in error has appealed. After the dismissial of the action in the court below, no action was taken to restrain the election board or to prevent it from placing the name of the defendant in error on the official ballot as a candidate for Congress to be voted for or against in the general election held in November, 1922, and the name of the defendant in error was by said election board placed on the official ballot and he was duly elected and is now the duly elected and qualified Representative in the Congress of the United States of the Eighth Congressional District of Oklahoma.

The action which the injunction proceeding sought to prevent has been performed and the question is now moot, and for that reason the appeal should be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Swindall v. State Election Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 25, 1923
219 P. 911 (Okla. 1923)
Case details for

Swindall v. State Election Board

Case Details

Full title:SWINDALL v. STATE ELECTION BOARD et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 25, 1923

Citations

219 P. 911 (Okla. 1923)
96 Okla. 40

Citing Cases

Westinghouse Elec. v. Grand River Dam Auth

[the] Supreme court will not attempt to determine abstract, hypothetical, or moot questions, but where it is…

Westgate Oil Co. v. Refineries Production Co.

"Where, after a proceeding in error has been instituted in this court, a condition arises under which the…