From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swendra v. Oc-Unk, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1987
134 A.D.2d 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

November 10, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Ricotta, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Denman, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, and defendant Niagara Frontier's motion granted. Memorandum: The court erred in denying the motion of defendant Niagara Frontier Transit Metro System, Inc. (NFT) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The record demonstrates that plaintiff was injured after alighting from a bus owned and operated by NFT when he walked in front of the stationary bus to cross the street and was struck by a truck owned and operated by the codefendants. A common carrier's duty to its passenger is discharged when it affords the passenger a safe place to alight (Blye v. Manhattan Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 124 A.D.2d 106; Ortola v Bouvier, 110 A.D.2d 1077). Since it is undisputed that plaintiff safely alighted from the bus before attempting to cross the street, NFT cannot be held liable.


Summaries of

Swendra v. Oc-Unk, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1987
134 A.D.2d 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Swendra v. Oc-Unk, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT SWENDRA, Respondent, v. OC-UNK, INC., et al., Respondents, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1987

Citations

134 A.D.2d 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Javed v. Shuang Zhang

Therefore, TCAT cannot be held liable for her injuries. See Francias, 222 A.D.2d at 215–16, 634 N.Y.S.2d 483…