In Sweet v. Mowry, 138 N.Y. 650 [ 34 N.E. 388], a motion for reargument was granted and a return of the remittitur requested.
Summary of this case from Ehrig v. AdamsArgued June 5, 1893
Decided June 13, 1893
Charles H. Peck for appellant.
C.L. Stone for respondents.
GRAY, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Order affirmed.
In Sweet v. Mowry, 138 N.Y. 650 [ 34 N.E. 388], a motion for reargument was granted and a return of the remittitur requested.
Summary of this case from Ehrig v. AdamsFull title:WILLIAM H. SWEET, Appellant, v . HENRY J. MOWRY et al., Respondents
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 13, 1893
The provision in the order restraining the defendant 'until the further order of the court' had no other…
EX PARTE GRIMES ET ALThe provision in the order restraining the defendant `until the further order of the court' had no other…