From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutton-El v. Bledsoe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 28, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-2354 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 28, 2012)

Summary

dismissing the complaint pursuant to Rule 41(b) after balancing the Poulis factors

Summary of this case from Juaquee v. Pike Cnty. Corr. Facility Emps.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-2354

11-28-2012

MARTIN J. SUTTON-EL, Plaintiff, v. BRYAN A. BLEDSOE, et al., Defendants.


(Judge Kosik)


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2012, IT APPEARING TO THE COURT THAT:

(1) Plaintiff, Martin J. Sutton-el, a former prisoner who had been confined at USP- Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, filed the instant civil rights action on December 20, 2011;

(2) Plaintiff's complaint raises issues of alleged Constitutional violations arising out of prison disciplinary proceedings and plaintiff's placement in the special management unit while he was housed at USP- Lewisburg;

(3) The action was assigned to Magistrate Judge Malachy E. Mannion for Report and Recommendation;

(4) On November 9, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 45) wherein he recommended that Plaintiff's action be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (b) and Local Rule 83.3.1 (a). Specifically, the Magistrate Judge found that based on the factors set forth in Poulis v. State Farm Fire Fire & Casualty Co., 747 F. 2d 863, 868 (3d Cir. 1994), and on the failure of plaintiff to apprise the court of his whereabouts, the action should be dismissed for failure to prosecute;

(5) Plaintiff has failed to file timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation;

AND, IT FURTHER APPEARING THAT:

(6) If no objections are filed to a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the plaintiff is not statutorily entitled to a ate novo review of his claims. 28 U.S.C.A.§636(b)(1)(C); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-53 (1985). Nonetheless, the usual practice of the district court is to give "reasoned consideration" to a magistrate judge's report prior to adopting it. Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987);

(7) We have considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and we concur with his recommendation;

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Malachy E. Mannion dated November 9, 2012 (Doc. 45) is ADOPTED;

(2) The above-captioned action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute; and

(3) The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case and to forward a copy to the Magistrate Judge.

______________________

Edwin M. Kosik

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sutton-El v. Bledsoe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 28, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-2354 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 28, 2012)

dismissing the complaint pursuant to Rule 41(b) after balancing the Poulis factors

Summary of this case from Juaquee v. Pike Cnty. Corr. Facility Emps.
Case details for

Sutton-El v. Bledsoe

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN J. SUTTON-EL, Plaintiff, v. BRYAN A. BLEDSOE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-2354 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 28, 2012)

Citing Cases

Juaquee v. Pike Cnty. Corr. Facility Emps.

(Doc. 17). Upon review of the R&R and after balancing all the Poulis factors, this Court will grant…