From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Susquehanna Collieries Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 25, 1940
11 A.2d 880 (Pa. 1940)

Opinion

January 22, 1940.

March 25, 1940.

Before SCHAFFER, C. J., MAXEY, DREW, LINN, STERN, BARNES and PATTERSON, JJ.

Appeal, No. 25, May T., 1940, from order of Superior Court, March T., 1940, No. 5, reversing order of Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, No. B-44-4-B-75, in case of Susquehanna Collieries Company v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. Order affirmed.

Appeal of last employer to Board of Review from decision of referee affirming an award of unemployment compensation by Department of Labor and Industry and dismissing the appeal of the employer.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court, reported in 137 Pa. Super. 110.

Order entered by Board dismissing appeal. Employer appealed to Superior Court which reversed the order of the Board and remitted the record for further action. An appeal was allowed to the Supreme Court from the order of the Superior Court.

Error assigned, among others, was order of Superior Court.

Charles R. Davis, Special Deputy Attorney General, for appellant.

Henry A. Gordon, for appellee.


Argued January 22, 1940.


The order of the Superior Court is affirmed on Judge PARKER'S opinion. Costs to be paid by appellant.


Summaries of

Susquehanna Collieries Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 25, 1940
11 A.2d 880 (Pa. 1940)
Case details for

Susquehanna Collieries Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Case Details

Full title:Susquehanna Collieries Company v. Unemployment Compensation Board of…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 25, 1940

Citations

11 A.2d 880 (Pa. 1940)
11 A.2d 880

Citing Cases

Pa. State Ch. of Commerce v. Torquato

Not only Westinghouse, but also all the other plaintiffs who contribute to the Unemployment Compensation…

McKeesport A.S.D. v. Un. Comp. Bd. of R

The claimants have filed motions to quash the School District's appeals on the basis that an employer lacks…