From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Surinach v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan 23, 2013
111 So. 3d 186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Summary

reversing denial of rule 3.850 motion where state admitted the postconviction court relied on documents which were not part of the court's files or records until the documents were attached to the state's response to the motion

Summary of this case from Cabrera v. State

Opinion

No. 4D11–4675.

2013-01-23

Raphael Gilbert SURINACH, Appellant, v. STATE of florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey J. Colbath, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2008CF018143AXX. Raphael Gilbert Surinach, Okeechobee, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey J. Colbath, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2008CF018143AXX.
Raphael Gilbert Surinach, Okeechobee, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Raphael Gilbert Surinach appeals an order summarily denying his rule 3.850 motion. We affirm the summary denial of his third ground for relief without further discussion, finding the claim lacked merit, but we reverse the summary denial of the other two claims.

In summarily denying the appellant's motion for postconviction relief, the postconviction court relied on documents (one being an unauthenticated transcript purporting to represent the appellant's taped confession to law enforcement), which the state admits were not part of the trial court's files or records below until they were attached to the state's response to the motion. This was error. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d); Smalls v. State, 18 So.3d 606, 608 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Johnson v. State, 736 So.2d 713, 714 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). See also Cortinas v. State, 91 So.3d 903, 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings.

WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Surinach v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan 23, 2013
111 So. 3d 186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

reversing denial of rule 3.850 motion where state admitted the postconviction court relied on documents which were not part of the court's files or records until the documents were attached to the state's response to the motion

Summary of this case from Cabrera v. State
Case details for

Surinach v. State

Case Details

Full title:Raphael Gilbert SURINACH, Appellant, v. STATE of florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

Citations

111 So. 3d 186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Citing Cases

Michel v. State

Neither is refuted by the record furnished. See generally Surinach v. State, 111 So. 3d 186 (Fla. 4th DCA…

Michel v. State

Neither is refuted by the record furnished. See generally Surinach v. State, 111 So.3d 186 (Fla. 4th DCA…