From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Surette v. Galiardo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 7, 1975
309 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Summary

determining that, due to the "special circumstances" of the case and the inadequacy of the remedy by appeal, certiorari relief was warranted concerning an order denying a motion to amend a complaint to add defendants

Summary of this case from Trucap Grantor Trust 2010-1 v. Pelt

Opinion

Nos. 74-1207, 74-1523.

March 7, 1975.

Petition from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Stewart F. LaMotte, Jr., J.

Irma V. Hernandez and Larry O. Schatzman, of Sepler Sussman, Hialeah, for petitioners.

William S. Gardella, of Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson Wahl, Fort Lauderdale, for respondents, School Board of Broward County and Pacific Indemnity Ins. Co.


Because of the special circumstances of this case we feel that plaintiffs may reasonably suffer material injury throughout the subsequent proceedings for which the remedy by appeal will be inadequate. We exercise our discretionary power to entertain the grievance via common law certiorari. Girten v. Bouvier, 155 So.2d 745 (2d D.C.A.Fla. 1963).

Pre-trial plaintiffs attempted to add certain additional insurers of the Broward County School Board as defendants in this tort action. It is our view that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law when it denied the plaintiffs' motion to amend the complaint, which motion would have brought the insurers into the suit.

Leave to amend should be freely granted. F.R.C.P. 1.190 (1974); Gull Construction Co. v. Hendrie, 271 So.2d 775 (2d D.C.A.Fla. 1973); Petterson v. Concrete Construction, Inc., 202 So.2d 191 (4th D.C.A.Fla. 1967). Thus we grant certiorari; quash the order denying plaintiffs' motion to amend the complaint; and remand for further proceedings.

This decision shall be without prejudice to the right of the new defendants to assert such defenses by way of motion, answer and affirmative defenses as they are advised. We do not express an opinion at this time as to the issue of statute of limitations if same should be raised.

Certiorari granted, with directions.

OWEN, C.J., and DOWNEY, J., concur.


Summaries of

Surette v. Galiardo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 7, 1975
309 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

determining that, due to the "special circumstances" of the case and the inadequacy of the remedy by appeal, certiorari relief was warranted concerning an order denying a motion to amend a complaint to add defendants

Summary of this case from Trucap Grantor Trust 2010-1 v. Pelt

In Surette v. Galiardo, 309 So.2d 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975) we granted certiorari in such case on the ground that plaintiffs may have reasonably suffered material injury for which a later appeal may have been inadequate.

Summary of this case from Goldberger v. Cam Corp. of Broward
Case details for

Surette v. Galiardo

Case Details

Full title:GILBERT E. SURETTE ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. ARTHUR GALIARDO, JR., ET AL.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 7, 1975

Citations

309 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

Trucap Grantor Trust 2010-1 v. Pelt

See, e.g., Skyrme v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 75 So. 3d 769, 771 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Harry Pepper &…

Karr v. Palm Peterbilt-GMC Trucks, Inc.

However, the petitioner never addressed the inadequacy of plenary appellate review, and through my own…