Superior Leasing, LLC v. Kaman Aerospace Corp.

Full title: SUPERIOR LEASING, LLC, et al., Plaintiff, v. KAMAN AEROSPACE CORP.…

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Feb 21, 2007

Civ. No. 04-3099-CO (D. Or. Feb. 21, 2007)

Opinion

Civ. No. 04-3099-CO.

February 21, 2007

ORDER

OWEN PANNER, District Judge

Magistrate Judge John P. Cooney filed Findings and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F. 2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

I have, therefore, given this matter de novo review. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Cooney.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Cooney's Findings and Recommendation (#97) is adopted. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (#12) is denied, and plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment (#22) is granted in part and denied in part as stated in the Findings and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.