From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SUPERIOR AIR PROD. v. TAX. DIV. DIR

Tax Court of New Jersey
Oct 18, 1988
10 N.J. Tax 238 (Tax 1988)

Opinion

Argued October 4, 1988.

Decided October 18, 1988.

Before Judges MICHELS, MUIR, Jr. and KEEFE.

On appeal from the Tax Court of New Jersey whose opinion is reported at 9 N.J. Tax 463 (Tax Ct. 1988).

Howard S. Denburg argued the cause for appellant ( Lowenstein, Sandler, Kohl, Fisher Boylan, attorneys, Howard S. Denburg and Gregory B. Reilly of counsel, John L. Berger on the brief).

Jeanne E. Gorrissen, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney, James J. Ciancia, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel, Jeanne E. Gorrissen on the brief).


The judgment of the Tax Court of New Jersey that affirmed the deficiency assessments levied by defendant Director of Taxation against plaintiff Superior Air Products International, Incorporated pursuant to the New Jersey Corporation Business Tax Act is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Andrew in Superior Air Products Int'l, Inc. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 9 N.J. Tax 463 (Tax Ct. 1988).


Summaries of

SUPERIOR AIR PROD. v. TAX. DIV. DIR

Tax Court of New Jersey
Oct 18, 1988
10 N.J. Tax 238 (Tax 1988)
Case details for

SUPERIOR AIR PROD. v. TAX. DIV. DIR

Case Details

Full title:SUPERIOR AIR PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v…

Court:Tax Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 18, 1988

Citations

10 N.J. Tax 238 (Tax 1988)

Citing Cases

Vivigen, Inc. v. Minzner

What we have found, however, indicates that the prevailing rule is that the doctrine is either rejected…

TEXACO v. TAXATION DIV. DIR

The time set forth for this application of funds is when a taxpayer is "entitled to any refund of taxes" and…