From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sung Eik Hong v. Quest Int'l Limousine, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 3, 2022
21-CV-07908 (SN) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-07908 (SN)

06-03-2022

SUNG EIK HONG, Plaintiff, v. QUEST INTERNATIONAL LIMOUSINE, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

SARAH NETBURN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE:

On February 3, 2022, the Court granted judgment for the defendants in Hong v. Quest International Limousine, Inc., No. 19-cv-4336 (SN), finding that the plaintiffs in that case (including Plaintiff Hong) were independent contractors, not employees of Quest International, under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the New York Labor Law (NYLL).

By June 10, 2022, the parties in this case are ORDERED to submit simultaneous supplemental briefing on the issue of whether Plaintiff Hong can assert a FLSA or NYLL antiretaliation claim given his previously determined independent contractor status. See Kim v. Lee, No. 21-cv-3552 (LJL), 2021 WL 6052122, at *10 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2021) (FLSA antiretaliation provision does not apply where there is no employer/employee relationship); see also Fernandez v. Kinray, Inc., 406 F.Supp.3d 256, 265 (E.D.N.Y. 2018); Sellers v. Royal Bank of Canada, No. 12-cv-1577 (KBF), 2014 WL 104682, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2014), aff'd, 592 Fed.Appx. 45 (2d Cir. 2015). The parties' submissions may not exceed five pages in length.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sung Eik Hong v. Quest Int'l Limousine, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 3, 2022
21-CV-07908 (SN) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Sung Eik Hong v. Quest Int'l Limousine, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SUNG EIK HONG, Plaintiff, v. QUEST INTERNATIONAL LIMOUSINE, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 3, 2022

Citations

21-CV-07908 (SN) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2022)