From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sucklal v. Goldman Sachs Mortg. Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 4, 2014
586 F. App'x 134 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-1729

12-04-2014

SIRINA SUCKLAL, Debtor - Appellant, v. GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY, Creditor - Appellee, NANCY SPENCER GRIGSBY, Trustee.

Sirina Sucklal, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Christopher Mullen, MORRIS HARDWICK SCHNEIDER, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-00039-JFM) Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sirina Sucklal, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Christopher Mullen, MORRIS HARDWICK SCHNEIDER, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Sirina Sucklal appeals from the district court's order dismissing as moot her appeal from the bankruptcy court's order lifting the automatic stay and allowing the sale of her real property. We have reviewed the record and find no error in the bankruptcy court's decision. See In re Frushour, 433 F.3d 393, 398 (4th Cir. 2005) (noting that, in an appeal from the district court sitting as an appellate court from a bankruptcy court, we "review directly the bankruptcy court's decision"). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Sucklal v. Goldman Sachs Mortg. Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 4, 2014
586 F. App'x 134 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Sucklal v. Goldman Sachs Mortg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SIRINA SUCKLAL, Debtor - Appellant, v. GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 4, 2014

Citations

586 F. App'x 134 (4th Cir. 2014)