From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sublett v. Allmerica Fin. Benefit Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 17, 2018
No. 4:17-cv-128-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 17, 2018)

Summary

noting that interpreting an insurance policy “isn't about the rules of the road,” so statutory definitions of “public highways” or streets “are thus ill-fitted to help resolve this dispute”

Summary of this case from Nat'l Mut. Ins. Co. v. Kobusch

Opinion

No. 4:17-cv-128-DPM

01-17-2018

DAVID SUBLETT PLAINTIFF v. ALLMERICA FINANCIAL BENEFIT INSURANCE CO. DEFENDANT


JUDGMENT

The amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice.

/s/_________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge

17 January 2018


Summaries of

Sublett v. Allmerica Fin. Benefit Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 17, 2018
No. 4:17-cv-128-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 17, 2018)

noting that interpreting an insurance policy “isn't about the rules of the road,” so statutory definitions of “public highways” or streets “are thus ill-fitted to help resolve this dispute”

Summary of this case from Nat'l Mut. Ins. Co. v. Kobusch
Case details for

Sublett v. Allmerica Fin. Benefit Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID SUBLETT PLAINTIFF v. ALLMERICA FINANCIAL BENEFIT INSURANCE CO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 17, 2018

Citations

No. 4:17-cv-128-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 17, 2018)

Citing Cases

Nat'l Mut. Ins. Co. v. Kobusch

That Arizona statutes provide conflicting definitions of “highway” (they do not define “road”) depending on…