From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Subirana v. Munds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 29, 1939
257 App. Div. 956 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

June 29, 1939.

Present — Martin, P.J., O'Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.


Order entered February 8, 1939, so far as appealed from unanimously modified by requiring, in addition to the items already ordered, the following: With respect to item 1, give the name under which plaintiff did business and the street address of such for the twenty years preceding 1935; with respect to item 2, subd. (a), state the person or persons "representing the defendants" who it is claimed requested plaintiff to terminate and surrender his business; with respect to item 3, set forth "a balance sheet of plaintiff's business at the date of such termination;" with respect to item 4, state the names and addresses of customers or clients plaintiff claims to have surrendered to defendants; with respect to item 5, give the names of defendants and their employees who plaintiff claims to have instructed in the business and to whom he claims to have imparted technical knowledge. Items 6, 9, 14 and 18 granted in full. No opinion. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Subirana v. Munds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 29, 1939
257 App. Div. 956 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

Subirana v. Munds

Case Details

Full title:TOMAS SUBIRANA, Respondent, v. LOUIS DE L'AIGLE MUNDS, etc., and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1939

Citations

257 App. Div. 956 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Roberts v. Champion International Inc.

(General Obligations Law, § 5-701, subd 10; Minichiello v Royal Business Funds Corp., 18 N.Y.2d 521, cert den…

Nifty Foods Corp. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

The plaintiff cannot rest his claim on a contract void under the Statute of Frauds, particularly where the…