From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sturgis v. Rupf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2013
Case No. CV 10-3680 LHK (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. CV 10-3680 LHK (PR)

01-06-2013

LAMOS WAYNE STURGIS, Plaintiff v. WARREN E. RUPF, ET AL. Defendants.

JONES DAY DAVID C. KIERNAN, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff SHARON L. ANDERSON, County Counsel D. CAMERON BAKER Deputy County Counsel Attomevs for Defendants DEPUTY DROLLETE DEPUTY FITZGERALD SHAWN WELCH


SHARON L. ANDERSON (SBN 94814)
County Counsel
D.CAMERON BAKER (SBN 154432)
Deputy County Counsel
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
Attorneys for Defendants
DEPUTY DROLLETE
DEPUTY FITZGERALD
SHAWN WELCH

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE


Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh, Presiding

Crtrm: 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. CA

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Lamos Wayne Sturgis and Defendants Deputy Drollete, Deputy Fitzgerald, and Deputy Shawn Welch have fully and Finally resolved all claims, disputes, and differences in the above-captioned action.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, and subject to the approval of the Court, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii):

1. The above-captioned action is hereby dismissed with prejudice; and

2. Each party shall bear their own attorneys' fees, expenses and costs.

JONES DAY

By: _____

DAVID C. KIERNAN, ESQ.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SHARON L. ANDERSON, County Counsel

By: ________________

D. CAMERON BAKER

Deputy County Counsel

Attomevs for Defendants

DEPUTY DROLLETE

DEPUTY FITZGERALD

SHAWN WELCH

ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-referenced action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall close the file.

______________________

HONORABLE LUCY H. KOY

Judge of United States District Court

DECLARATION OF LAUREN CHARNESKI IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

I, Lauren Charneski, hereby declare under penalty of perjury as follows:

1. I am an attorney admitted to practice in the State of California and before this Court. I am an associate with the law firm of Jones Day, and I am counsel to Plaintiff Lamos Sturgis in this action. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated below, and I am competent to testify in court regarding them if I am called as a witness.

2. The electronic signatories to this STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, David C. Kiernan and D. Cameron Baker, concur in the filing of this document.

I swear under the penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

By: ____________

Lauren Charneski


Summaries of

Sturgis v. Rupf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2013
Case No. CV 10-3680 LHK (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Sturgis v. Rupf

Case Details

Full title:LAMOS WAYNE STURGIS, Plaintiff v. WARREN E. RUPF, ET AL. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 6, 2013

Citations

Case No. CV 10-3680 LHK (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2013)

Citing Cases

Cochran v. Flint

By that we regard it as clear that the character of annexation is such that the machinery may be taken out…