From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stuback v. Sussman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1939
281 N.Y. 719 (N.Y. 1939)

Opinion

Argued October 2, 1939

Decided October 17, 1939

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, MILLER, J.

I. Maurice Wormser and Samuel Firestone for appellants.

Pliny W. Williamson and Joseph Schwartzman for respondent. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( Benjamin Heffner, Colin McLennan and John F.X. McGohey of counsel), for the People of the State of New York, amicus curiae. Pliny W. Williamson and Thomas J. Whalen for Russell Sage Foundation, amicus curiae.



Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ. Taking no part: O'BRIEN, J.


Summaries of

Stuback v. Sussman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1939
281 N.Y. 719 (N.Y. 1939)
Case details for

Stuback v. Sussman

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES H. STUBACK, Respondent, v. SAM SUSSMAN et al., Doing Business…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 17, 1939

Citations

281 N.Y. 719 (N.Y. 1939)
23 N.E.2d 544

Citing Cases

People v. Ritter

They have been passed upon by the Appellate Division in a case in which the corporate petitioner was itself a…

Martorano v. Capital Finance Corp.

I believe that such benefit, concededly received by the lender, is — within the language of section 352 — "in…