From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strawhorn v. Strawhorn

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Nov 3, 1982
451 A.2d 665 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 1135 (On Remand), September Term, 1980.

Decided November 3, 1982.

DIVORCE — Family Home — Section 3-6A-06(a) Of The Courts And Judicial Proceedings Article Limits An Award Of Exclusive Use And Possession Of The Family Home To A Spouse With Custody Of A Natural Or Adopted Child — A Stepchild Is Not Included Within The Statute. pp. 614-615

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County (MITCHELL, J.).

Judgment in Strawhorn v. Strawhorn, 49 Md. App. 649, 435 A.2d 466 (1981) was vacated and remanded for further proceedings in light of Bledsoe v. Bledsoe, 294 Md. 183, 448 A.2d 353 (1982). See Strawhorn v. Strawhorn, 294 Md. 322, 450 A.2d 490 (1982).

Order affirmed in part and reversed in part; case remanded for further proceedings on the issue of alimony; costs to be divided equally between the parties.

The cause was submitted on remand to GILBERT, C.J., and MOYLAN and MASON, JJ.


In Strawhorn v. Strawhorn, 49 Md. App. 649 (1981), we held, among other things, that the chancellor did not err in awarding exclusive possession and use of the family home to Janet P. Strawhorn and her minor child of a former marriage, under § 3-6A-06(a) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article. After granting certiorari in this case, the Court of Appeals deferred action on the matter pending disposition of the case of Donald L. Bledsoe v. Pamela J. Bledsoe, No. 98, S.T. 1981. On 9 August 1982, the case of Bledsoe was decided, and the Court of Appeals held that under § 3-6A-06(a) of the Court and Judicial Proceedings Article, a court can only award exclusive use and possession of the family home to a spouse with custody of a natural or adopted child, and that a stepchild (such as in Strawhorn) is not included within the scope of the statute.

In a per curiam order dated 13 September 1982, the Court of Appeals vacated the judgment of this Court in Strawhorn and remanded the case for further proceedings in light of its opinion in Bledsoe. Pursuant to this order, we modify our opinion in Strawhorn to the extent it conflicts with Bledsoe and hold that the chancellor erred as a matter of law in awarding exclusive use and possession of the family home to Janet P. Strawhorn and her minor child of a former marriage.

Order affirmed in part and reversed in part; case remanded for further proceedings on the issue of alimony; costs to be divided equally between the parties.


Summaries of

Strawhorn v. Strawhorn

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Nov 3, 1982
451 A.2d 665 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1982)
Case details for

Strawhorn v. Strawhorn

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MARTIN STRAWHORN v . JANET B. STRAWHORN

Court:Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Nov 3, 1982

Citations

451 A.2d 665 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1982)
451 A.2d 665

Citing Cases

Kilsheimer v. Dewberry Davis

See also Strawhorn v. Strawhorn, 49 Md. App. 649, 659, 435 A.2d 466 (1981), vacated, 294 Md. 322, 450 A.2d…