From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strauss v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 4, 1964
337 F.2d 853 (5th Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 20752.

November 4, 1964.

Arthur B. Cunningham, Miami, Fla., James M. Roberts, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

Kirby W. Patterson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Lloyd G. Bates, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from the denial by the trial court of a motion for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. We are unable to hold that the trial court erred in light of the strict requirements for the granting of such extraordinary motions. See Ledet v. United States, 5 Cir., 297 F.2d 737, and Newman v. United States, 5 Cir., 238 F.2d 861.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Strauss v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 4, 1964
337 F.2d 853 (5th Cir. 1964)
Case details for

Strauss v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Robert L. STRAUSS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Nov 4, 1964

Citations

337 F.2d 853 (5th Cir. 1964)

Citing Cases

Strauss v. United States

The newly discovered evidence was the assertion by Strauss that he had discovered, after the trial, that his…

AG PRO, INC. v. SAKRAIDA

Sakraida contends that these facts demonstrate that he made a good faith effort to inquire into the facts…