From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Straughn v. G.J.M., Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 13, 1977
344 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Summary

holding that "mere naked demand" by agency and no affirmative action to enforce demand not enough to establish sword wielder exception

Summary of this case from State v. Lindquist

Opinion

No. EE-173.

April 13, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Bay County, Mercer P. Spear, J.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Caroline C. Mueller, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.

Bill R. Hutto, of Syfrett, Hutto Paulk, Panama City, for appellee.


This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the trial court which denied appellant's motion to dismiss for improper venue or, in the alternative, to transfer venue. Appellee initiated the suit below by filing a complaint contesting a documentary stamp tax assessment imposed by appellants upon an assignment of lease. Subject to certain exceptions, a state agency may be sued only in the county in which its official headquarters is located, which in this instance is Leon County, the seat of state government. In Department of Revenue v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Ft. Myers, 256 So.2d 524 (Fla. 2 DCA 1971), our sister court of the Second District held that where the only action taken by the Department of Revenue with regard to collection of taxes was the sending of a "formal notice assessment and demand" for delinquent taxes specifying the amount and date due, that such was a mere naked demand and not affirmative action to enforce that demand. In the absence of affirmative action to enforce the demand, the Second District Court held that venue would not lie in Lee County but would lie only in the county where the state agency maintains its official headquarters. In the case sub judice appellants' only actions in relation to the tax have been a request for information and the issuance of a "proposed notice of assessment of tax and penalty under Chapter 201, Florida Statutes." Such does not at this point constitute an attempt by appellant to seize and sell property to enforce collection of the disputed tax. Therefore, venue does not lie in Bay County but only in Leon County.

Reversed and remanded with directions that the case be transferred to the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit in and for Leon County, Florida.

BOYER, C.J., and MILLS, J., concur.


Summaries of

Straughn v. G.J.M., Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 13, 1977
344 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

holding that "mere naked demand" by agency and no affirmative action to enforce demand not enough to establish sword wielder exception

Summary of this case from State v. Lindquist
Case details for

Straughn v. G.J.M., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:J. ED STRAUGHN AND STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, APPELLANTS, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 13, 1977

Citations

344 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

State v. Lindquist

See id.; Dowdy v. Lawton, 72 So.2d 50, 51 (Fla. 1954) (refusing to override venue privilege where "At most…

Florida Dep't of Revenue v. Hardy

Accordingly, the First Federal court determined that in the absence of affirmative or official action to…