From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strand Classics Restorations v. Emiliano

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 2, 2018
2018-UP-171 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 2, 2018)

Opinion

2018-UP-171

05-02-2018

Strand Classics Restorations, Appellant, v. Frank Emiliano, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2016-001409

Raymond Carl Fischer and William Stuart Duncan, of Georgetown, for Appellant. Frank Emiliano, of Coral Springs, Florida, pro se.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted March 1, 2018

Appeal From Georgetown County Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

Raymond Carl Fischer and William Stuart Duncan, of Georgetown, for Appellant.

Frank Emiliano, of Coral Springs, Florida, pro se.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: Indigo Assocs. v. Ryan Inv. Co., 314 S.C. 519, 523, 431 S.E.2d 271, 273 (Ct. App. 1993) ("The circuit court, acting as an appellate court in a case heard by the magistrate, cannot consider questions that have not been presented to the magistrate.").

AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

SHORT, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Strand Classics Restorations v. Emiliano

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 2, 2018
2018-UP-171 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 2, 2018)
Case details for

Strand Classics Restorations v. Emiliano

Case Details

Full title:Strand Classics Restorations, Appellant, v. Frank Emiliano, Respondent…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: May 2, 2018

Citations

2018-UP-171 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 2, 2018)