From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stracke v. Farquar

Supreme Court of California
Mar 31, 1942
20 Cal.2d 82 (Cal. 1942)

Opinion

Docket No. S.F. 16737.

March 31, 1942.

PROCEEDING in mandamus to compel omission of names from ballot. Writ denied.

G.H. Van Harvey for Petitioner.

L.G. Hitchcock for Respondent.

DeMeo DeMeo and Clarendon W. Anderson, as Amici Curiae, on behalf of Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] The petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, as City Clerk of Santa Rosa, to omit the names of seven persons as candidates for the office of councilman from the ballot to be used at the municipal election to be held April 7, was denied in the exercise of the discretion of the court for the reason that it appeared from the answer and stipulation of the parties that the ballot already had been printed and distributed to certain voters. Such denial should not be taken or understood as an adjudication in any way of the questions of law presented by the petition.


Summaries of

Stracke v. Farquar

Supreme Court of California
Mar 31, 1942
20 Cal.2d 82 (Cal. 1942)
Case details for

Stracke v. Farquar

Case Details

Full title:WALTER STRACKE, Petitioner, v. AGNES S. FARQUAR, as City Clerk, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Mar 31, 1942

Citations

20 Cal.2d 82 (Cal. 1942)
124 P.2d 9

Citing Cases

Treber v. Superior Court

(See County of Sacramento v. Hickman (1967) 66 Cal.2d 841, 845 [ 59 Cal.Rptr. 609, 428 P.2d 593].) Although…

Kahn v. East Bay Mun. Util. Dist.

[Citations.]" (68 Cal.2d at p. 134. See also Stracke v. Farquar (1942) 20 Cal.2d 82 [ 124 P.2d 9]; Rice v.…