Opinion
No. 72-2222. Summary Calendar.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.
September 20, 1972.
William I. Aynes, Richard R. Kirby, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.
John W. Stokes, U.S. Atty., Charney K. Berger, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
Appellant sought disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The district court affirmed the denial of relief by the Secretary. We find no error.
The pertinent findings of the Secretary were supported by substantial evidence, 42 U.S.C.A., section 405(g). There was no denial of procedural or substantive due process. There was no application of an incorrect legal standard. The report of the Vocational Rehabilitation expert was admissible under the teachings of Richardson v. Perales, 1971, 402 U.S. 389, 91 S.Ct. 1420, 28 L.Ed.2d 842.
Affirmed.