Opinion
Argued April 20, 1891
Decided June 2, 1891
Samuel Blythe Rogers for appellant.
Martin J. Keogh for respondent.
VANN, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Stouter v. Manhattan Railway Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1891
28 N.E. 254 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Stouter v. Manhattan Railway Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1891
28 N.E. 254 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Stouter v. Manhattan Railway Company
Case Details
Full title:MARY F. STOUTER, Respondent, v . THE MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 2, 1891
Citations
28 N.E. 254 (N.Y. 1891)
28 N.E. 254
Citing Cases
Smith v. Cowles
The objection was simply a general one, that they were not issued in conformity to the Code. Nothing was…
Shepherd v. Ins. Co.Expert opinion evidence as to the cause of death or of a particular physical condition has been admitted in…