From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

N. V. Stoomvaart Maatschappij "Nederland” v. GTE International, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 5, 1976
531 F.2d 1143 (2d Cir. 1976)

Opinion

No. 529, Docket 75-7493.

Argued March 4, 1976.

Decided March 5, 1976.

William M. Kimball, New York City (Hervey C. Allen, Michael Marks Cohen and Burlingham, Underwood Lord, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Sidney A. Schwartz, Joseph Arthur Cohen, and Alexander, Ash, Schwartz Cohen, New York City, submitted a brief for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, and SMITH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.


We affirm the judgment below on the basis of the district court's opinion, 411 F.Supp. 331, except to the extent that it relies upon the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 46 U.S.C. § 1304(3). We consider the common law principles of tort and agency sufficient to support the conclusion that the shipper was not liable unless it or its agents were negligent. Accordingly, we need not pass upon the district court's holding that § 1304(3) precludes GTE from being held liable to Nederland for the injury caused by the negligence of Ainslie.


Summaries of

N. V. Stoomvaart Maatschappij "Nederland” v. GTE International, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 5, 1976
531 F.2d 1143 (2d Cir. 1976)
Case details for

N. V. Stoomvaart Maatschappij "Nederland” v. GTE International, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:N. V. STOOMVAART MAATSCHAPPIJ "NEDERLAND", THIRD-PARTY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Mar 5, 1976

Citations

531 F.2d 1143 (2d Cir. 1976)

Citing Cases

Senator Linie GMBH & Co. KG v. Sunway Line, Inc.

lana De Navigacion, 446 F.2d 1339, 1341 (2d Cir. 1971) (holding that under § 1304(3), shipper need not supply…

Aslanidis v. U.S. Lines, Inc.

In fact, the consignee of the sulphur dioxide — who stood in the same position as Brandeis New York does here…