From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stonewall Ins. v. Emerald Fisheries

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 7, 1980
388 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 79-2285.

October 7, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Arden M. Siegendorf, J.

Lane, Mitchell Harris and Byron B. Mathews, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Peeples, Earl, Smith, Moore Blank and Richard M. Goldstein and Robert C. Apgar, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C.J., and SCHWARTZ and BASKIN, JJ.


Based upon logical inferences derived from substantial competent evidence, the trial court determined that the damage to the engine of the vessel, Don Rafa, resulted from its operation with insufficient oil pressure or after it had been overheated, and that its operation in that manner was a negligent or intentional act of the captain or a crew member. The court's ruling correctly determined that the loss was covered under Emerald Fisheries' marine insurance policy issued by Stonewall Insurance Company. The burden was on Stonewall to establish that the loss resulted from a cause excepted from the policy. U.S. Liability Insurance Co. v. Bove, 347 So.2d 678 (Fla.3d DCA 1977). Emerald Fisheries was not required to disprove other possible causes. See Aetna Casualty Surety Co. v. Florida Power Light Co., 367 So.2d 1104 (Fla.3d DCA 1979).

The decision is, therefore, affirmed.


Summaries of

Stonewall Ins. v. Emerald Fisheries

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 7, 1980
388 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Stonewall Ins. v. Emerald Fisheries

Case Details

Full title:STONEWALL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. EMERALD FISHERIES, INC.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 7, 1980

Citations

388 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Shankle v. VIP Lounge, Inc.

The burden is on the insurer to prove non-coverage once the insured has shown a loss from causes within the…

Portela Inv. v. Piedra

Consequently, we find no error in that portion of the trial court's final judgment finding liability for…