From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stokes v. Home Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 9, 1933
63 S.W.2d 657 (Ark. 1933)

Opinion

No. 4-3126

Opinion delivered October 9, 1933.

1. BANKS AND BANKING — INSOLVENCY — SET-OFF. — The law of set-off as between an insolvent bank and its creditors applies only to concurrent liabilities on the date of its insolvency. 2. BANKS AND BANKING — SET-OFF. — The creditor of an insolvent bank cannot set off a contingent liability against an absolute liability due to the bank. 3. BANKS AND BANKING — SET-OFF — CONTINGENT CLAIM. — The assignee of a depositor in an insolvent bank cannot offset its claim for such deposit against a contingent indebtedness subsequently accruing from the assignee to the bank.

Appeal from Arkansas Circuit Court, Northern District W. J. Waggoner, Judge; reversed.

A. G. Meehan and John W. Moncrief, for appellant.

Mann Mann and Ingram Moher, for appellee.


The only question presented by this appeal is whether the Central States Life Insurance Company, assignee of the Home Life Insurance Company, has a right to set off its deposit of $11,000 in the Merchants' Planters' Bank of Humphrey against the amount of $1,884.46, which it owed the bank on the 27th day of April, 1932, when this suit was instituted by E. B. Stokes as trustee for Cora Belle Watson, and said bank upon a life insurance policy issued by the Home Life Insurance Company on June 1, 1930, to said Stokes as trustee aforesaid upon the life of J. T. Watson. The life insurance policy was for $5,000, and at the time J. T. Watson was indebted to the bank in an amount equal to about one-half the face value thereof. The policy was for the bank's protection to the extent of said indebtedness.

On November 17, 1930, said bank became insolvent, and the Bank Commissioner took possession of its assets and proceeded to liquidate same. Several months after the failure of said bank, the Central States Life Insurance Company acquired the assets of the Home Life Insurance Company and assumed the payment of all its death claims. Among the assets which the Central States Life Insurance Company acquired was the deposit of $11,000 which the Home Life Insurance Company had in said bank on the date the bank became insolvent, for which amount the Central States Life Insurance Company subsequently presented a claim to the Bank Commissioner. Subsequent to the insolvency of the bank and the acquisition of the $11,000 deposit by the Central States Life Insurance Company, to-wit, on June 9, 1931, John T. Watson died, and the insurance companies became liable on the policy to the trustee aforesaid for Mrs. Watson, and said bank according to their respective interests therein. At the time John T. Watson died, he. owed the bank $1,884.46. The insurance companies admitted their indebtedness to the trustee for the benefit of Mrs. Watson and paid her, but refused to pay the trustee $1,884.46 for the benefit of said bank or the general depositors thereof, claiming they were entitled to set off the amount due the bank as against the deposit of $11,000.

It will be observed from the facts detailed above that, on the date of the failure of said bank, the insurance companies were not indebted to it in any sum. At that time the Central States Life Insurance Company was not either a debtor or creditor of the bank, and the Home Life Insurance Company was a creditor, but not a debtor of the bank. No liability existed under the insurance policy, and could not exist as long as John T. Watson continued to live. The law of set-off in this State between defunct banks and their creditors applies only to concurrent liabilities on the date of the insolvency of such bank. A contingent liability cannot be set off against an uncontingent liability. The claims to be set off must be mutual, certain and concurrent. U.S. Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Maxwell, 152 Ark. 64, 237 S.W. 708; Sloss v. Taylor, 182 Ark. 1031, 34 S.W.2d 231; Taylor v. Cox, 183 Ark. 1117, 40 S.W.2d 444.

The trial court allowed the set-off, and in doing so erred. The decree is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to deny the set-off, and to allow appellant 12 per cent. penalty on $1,884.46 and an attorney's fee of $200.


Summaries of

Stokes v. Home Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 9, 1933
63 S.W.2d 657 (Ark. 1933)
Case details for

Stokes v. Home Life Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:STOKES v. HOME LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Oct 9, 1933

Citations

63 S.W.2d 657 (Ark. 1933)
63 S.W.2d 657

Citing Cases

Vibo Corp. v. State ex rel. McDaniel

This court has said that "[a] contingent liability cannot be set off against an uncontingent liability."…

Grant S. L. v. Resolution Trust

The RTC argues that any liability of Savers Federal to Grant County was nothing more than a contingent…