From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stoddard-Nunez v. City of Hayward

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 29, 2017
Case No. 13-cv-04490-KAW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 13-cv-04490-KAW

08-29-2017

JESSIE LEE JETMORE STODDARD-NUNEZ, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HAYWARD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment in this case. Having reviewed the parties' briefing, the Court requires supplemental briefing on the following issues:

1. Was a judicial declaration terminating Mr. Jeffrey Stoddard's parental rights over Shawn Joseph Jetmore Stoddard-Nunez ever obtained? Were proceedings to terminate parental rights ever initiated, pursuant to California Family Code §§ 7800 et seq.?

2. California Family Code § 7803 states that a judicial declaration of freedom from parental custody and control terminates all parental rights and responsibilities with regard to that child. If no judicial declaration was made, how can the Court in the instant case find that Mr. Stoddard's parental rights were terminated? The parties should be prepared to discuss any authority in support of their positions, as well as In re Marriage of Dunmore, 83 Cal. App. 4th 1 (2000) (upholding trial court's finding that a father was still required to pay child support because there was no finding under § 7803 that parental rights had been terminated, despite prior adoption proceedings finding that the father had abandoned the child under § 8604) and County of Ventura v. Gonzales, 88 Cal. App. 4th 1120 (2001) ("The parent-child relationship and its attendant duty of support do not end when a child is declared a dependent of the
juvenile court and removed from the parents' custody").

3. Is there any case where no proceedings under the California Family Code §§ 7800 et seq. were instituted and no judicial declaration of abandonment had been made, yet a court still found that parental rights were terminated under § 7822?

The supplemental briefs shall be no more than five pages, and must be filed by September 5, 2017 at 5:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 29, 2017

/s/_________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Stoddard-Nunez v. City of Hayward

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 29, 2017
Case No. 13-cv-04490-KAW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Stoddard-Nunez v. City of Hayward

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE LEE JETMORE STODDARD-NUNEZ, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HAYWARD, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 29, 2017

Citations

Case No. 13-cv-04490-KAW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2017)