From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stockett v. Henry

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Jul 2, 1915
28 Cal.App. 45 (Cal. Ct. App. 1915)

Opinion

Civ. No. 1519.

July 2, 1915.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County refusing permission to correct a notice of intention to move for a new trial. William H. Waste, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

George Ingraham, for Appellants.

Edward R. Eliassen, for Respondents.


This is an appeal from an order of the trial court refusing to permit the appellants to correct their notice of intention to move for a new trial.

We are satisfied from an examination of the record that the discretion with which said court was invested in the matter of permitting a correction of the notice of intention to move for a new trial in the respect sought by said motion, was not abused in refusing to permit such correction, and its action taken therein will not therefore be disturbed upon appeal.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Stockett v. Henry

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Jul 2, 1915
28 Cal.App. 45 (Cal. Ct. App. 1915)
Case details for

Stockett v. Henry

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM STOCKETT et al., Appellants, v. THOMAS HENRY, et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District

Date published: Jul 2, 1915

Citations

28 Cal.App. 45 (Cal. Ct. App. 1915)
151 P. 150

Citing Cases

Sitkei v. Frimel

[3] Since the ground of newly discovered evidence was not specified in the original notice of intention and…