From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stockert v. Stockert

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Oct 16, 2001
2001 N.D. 160 (N.D. 2001)

Opinion

No. 20000353

Decided October 16, 2001

Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Allan L. Schmalenberger, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Eugene F. Buresh, Ficek Buresh, P.C., 41 1st Ave. W., P.O. Box 1224, Dickinson, N.D. 58602-1224, for defendant and appellee.

Scott Stockert (on brief), pro se, 694 9th Avenue West, Dickinson, N.D. 58601, for plaintiff and appellant.


[¶ 1] Scott Stockert appeals from an order denying his motion for a change of custody of the parties' child. Stockert argues the trial court erred in finding no significant change in circumstances. A party seeking modification of a custody order bears the burden of showing a significant change in circumstances.Krizan v. Krizan, 1998 ND 186, ¶ 4, 585 N.W.2d 576. A trial court's custody modification decision "is a finding of fact subject to the `clearly erroneous' standard of review." Mosbrucker v. Mosbrucker, 1997 ND 72, ¶ 5, 562 N.W.2d 390. "Not every change in circumstances will amount to a `significant change' warranting a change or modification of custody." Id. at ¶ 6. We conclude the trial court did not err in finding there was no significant change of circumstances requiring a change of custody. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

William A. Neumann

Dale V. Sandstrom


Summaries of

Stockert v. Stockert

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Oct 16, 2001
2001 N.D. 160 (N.D. 2001)
Case details for

Stockert v. Stockert

Case Details

Full title:Scott Stockert, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Wanda Stockert, Defendant and…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Oct 16, 2001

Citations

2001 N.D. 160 (N.D. 2001)

Citing Cases

State v. Stockert

Judge Anderson was removed from the divorce case because Stockert filed a timely demand for change of judge,…