From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stockard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1975
315 So. 2d 605 (Ala. Crim. App. 1975)

Opinion

6 Div. 885.

June 30, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Walker County, T. Leon Beaird, J.

Tweedy, Jackson Beech, Jasper, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and Carol Jean Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

A motion to strike the record proper and dismiss the appeal is proper where the transcript of the evidence was untimely filed and the record proper was untimely filed. Hadley v. State, 228 Ala. 293, 259 So.2d 853, cert. den., 409 U.S. 937, 93 S.Ct. 245, 34 L.Ed.2d 190; Relf v. State, 267 Ala. 3, 99 So.2d 216; Mahone v. State, 39 Ala. App. 567, 105 So.2d 134. The court reporter's certified transcript shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court within sixty days from the date of the taking of the appeal or within sixty days from the court's ruling on a motion for a new trial, whichever date is later. Relf v. State, supra; Title 7, Sections 827(1)-827(4) Code of Alabama 1940, Recomp. 1958. Where there is no order of the court showing a continuance on a motion for a new trial, the motion becomes discontinued and the order overruling the motion is of no effect. Relf v. State, supra; Mahone v. State, supra. The motion for a new trial having been discontinued, the appellate court must look to the date on which appeal was taken in determining the time for the filing of the transcript of the evidence in the Circuit Court. Relf, supra. Where accused takes an appeal and such is recited in the judgment entry, written notice filed later is ineffectual in changing the date for computation of time in taking an appeal. Mahone, supra. If a transcript of the evidence is established too late, the date from which the sixty days begins to run is the last day upon which the transcript of the evidence could or should have been filed by the court reporter with the circuit clerk. Relf v. State, supra; Mahone v. State, supra; Supreme Court Rule 37; Title 7, Section 769, Code of Alabama 1940, Recomp. 1958.


The appellant was charged with assault with intent to murder one Giles Anderson. Appellant was duly arraigned on August 5, 1974, accompanied by counsel, and entered a plea of not guilty. The cause was set for trial for October 15, 1974, and on October 16, 1974, the trial commenced. On October 18, 1974, the jury found the appellant guilty of assault and battery, and the trial court entered judgment on this same date, setting sentence at six months imprisonment in the Walker County Jail. The appellant gave notice of appeal and posted appeal bond, also on October 18, 1974.

The indictment and ensuing trial in this cause arose out of a shooting incident, which occurred at the home of the appellant's mother on March 6, 1974, in Jasper, Alabama. We need not here delineate the facts due to the following circumstances which occurred following trial.

I

The appellant, through his attorney, filed a motion for new trial on November 6, 1974, and the trial court entered its order continuing same for a hearing until November 25, 1974. On December 5, 1974, the trial court overruled the motion for new trial. On January 28, 1974, the appellant filed a written notice of appeal with the circuit clerk, and a court reporter's transcript of the evidence was filed with the circuit clerk on March 24, 1975. The complete transcript is certified to by the circuit clerk under date of April 22, 1975, and was filed in this Court on April 23, 1975.

The Attorney General has filed a motion to strike the transcript of the evidence, transcript of the record proper, and to dismiss this appeal, citing Relf v. State, 267 Ala. 3, 99 So.2d 216, and Mahone v. State, 39 Ala. App. 567, 105 So.2d 134. We are of the opinion that the Attorney General's motion is well taken.

There is no order of the trial court continuing the motion for new trial from the date on which the same was heard, November 25, 1974, until its ruling on December 5, 1974, denying this motion. Under Mahone v. State, supra, the motion for new trial thereby became discontinued, and its order of December 5, 1974, overruling same, was of no legal effect. Relf v. State, supra; Mahone v. State, supra.

Moreover, the appellant had given oral notice of appeal on the same date as he was sentenced, and also filed his appeal bond, all on October 18, 1974.

We therefore hold that the court reporter's transcript of the evidence should have been filed with the circuit clerk within sixty days from October 18, 1974, since notice of appeal had been given in open court on this date, which was also the date of sentencing of the appellant. Relf v. State, 267 Ala. 3, 99 So.2d 216; Seibert v. State, 53 Ala. App. 229, 298 So.2d 649, cert. denied, 292 Ala. 748, 298 So.2d 652.

We note that there were no extensions of time requested or shown in this transcript. Moreover, there is no showing of indigency anywhere in this transcript. See Hadley v. State, 288 Ala. 293, 259 So.2d 853; Ferguson v. State, 313 So.2d 561, 1975, cert. denied, May 8, 1975, 294 Ala. ___, 313 So.2d 564. The motion to strike the transcript of the evidence is due to be granted, and also the motion to strike the entire transcript, since it affirmatively appears that this was not filed in this Court until April 23, 1975, there being no extensions of time granted for this purpose.

The Attorney General's motion being well taken, the entire record is due to be and the same is hereby stricken. Mahone v. State, 39 Ala. App. 567, 105 So.2d 134; Sweat v. State, 54 Ala. App. 111, 305 So.2d 386, cert. denied, 293 Ala. 775, 305 So.2d 386.

Record stricken, appeal dismissed.

All the Judges concur.


Summaries of

Stockard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1975
315 So. 2d 605 (Ala. Crim. App. 1975)
Case details for

Stockard v. State

Case Details

Full title:Herbert STOCKARD v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 30, 1975

Citations

315 So. 2d 605 (Ala. Crim. App. 1975)
315 So. 2d 605