From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stilley v. Young

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 12, 2000
28 S.W.3d 858 (Ark. 2000)

Opinion

00-1119

Opinion delivered October 12, 2000

Appeal error — motion for expedited consideration — denied. — The supreme court denied appellant's motion for expedited consideration.

Appeal from Saline Circuit Court; Grisham A. Phillips Jr., Judge; Motion for Expedited Consideration; denied.

Appellant, pro se.

No response.


The appellant/intervenor, Oscar Stilley, seeks an expedited briefing schedule and decision in conjunction with the appeal of a Saline County Circuit Court decision. We deny the motion.

The appellant filed his motion to expedite on Thursday, October 5, 2000, and this matter came before this Court on the following Wednesday, October 11, 2000. The appellant has made no request for a stay, but asserts the following:

The county board of election commissioners is required to "prepare official absentee ballots and deliver them to the county clerk for mailing to all qualified applicants as soon as practicable before the last day on which the ballot will be counted but in any event not less than twenty-five (25) days before any election." Ark. Code Ann. [§] 7-5-407. Mertz v. State, 318 Ark. 239, 884 S.W.2d 264 (1994).

By the calculations of undersigned, the 25 day deadline will not be passed if this cause is decided by October 12, 2000, same being a regular day of decision for the Court. Appellant prays that the scheduling order provide for the completion of this appeal in time for decision on or before October 12, 2000.
[1] The appellant asks us to require the appellees to present a brief in time for the Court to consider this case prior to October 12, 2000, so that the case will be decided prior to the commencement of absentee balloting, which begins on October 13, 2000, for the November 7, 2000, election. To do so would not only be unfair to the appellees, it would also not give this Court the time needed for deliberation of the issue or issues to be presented. See Stilley v. Bradley, 342 Ark. 274, 27 S.W.3d 436 (October 6, 2000); McCuen v. Harris, 318 Ark. 522, 891 S.W.2d 350 (1994). We, therefore, must deny the motion for expedited consideration.

Denied.


Summaries of

Stilley v. Young

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 12, 2000
28 S.W.3d 858 (Ark. 2000)
Case details for

Stilley v. Young

Case Details

Full title:OSCAR STILLEY v. JOHN R. YOUNG, FREDDY BURTON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS…

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Oct 12, 2000

Citations

28 S.W.3d 858 (Ark. 2000)
28 S.W.3d 858

Citing Cases

Committee to Estab. Sherwood Fire Dep't v. Hillman

This case is like McCuen v. Harris, 318 Ark. 522, 891 S.W.2d 350 (1994), in which we denied a motion for…

Ward v. Priest

This case is like McCuen v. Harris, 318 Ark. 522, 891 S.W.2d 350 (1994), in which we denied a motion for…