From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stidham v. Varano

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 8, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3216 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 8, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3216.

June 8, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 8th day of June, 2009, upon careful and independent review of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED;
2. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED;
3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and
4. A Certificate of Appealability will not issue.


Summaries of

Stidham v. Varano

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 8, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3216 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 8, 2009)
Case details for

Stidham v. Varano

Case Details

Full title:WINSTON STIDHAM, Petitioner, v. DAVID A. VARANO, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 8, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3216 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 8, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wyatt v. Diguglielmo

"If a bypassed state remedy is no longer available because it is time-barred due to a state limitations…

Hall v. Beard

See, e.g., Fahy v. Horn, 516 F.3d 169, 205 (3d Cir.2008) (claim for cumulative error presented to the PCRA…