From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Scheinert

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1979
392 N.E.2d 563 (N.Y. 1979)

Opinion

Argued April 30, 1979

Decided May 31, 1979

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, MORRIE SLIFKIN, J.

David Mac Rae Wagner and Robert G. Natelson for appellants.

Marc L. Parris, County Attorney (Martin Hurwitz of counsel), for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Section 51 of the General Municipal Law provides for personal liability of public officials who commit illegal acts in their official capacities "by collusion or otherwise". We agree with the Appellate Division that under this statute personal liability arises only if the illegal acts were collusive, fraudulent, or motivated by personal gain (Daly v Haight, 170 App. Div. 469, affd 224 N.Y. 726). Since there is no evidence in the record that the conduct of the defendant county legislators was of the nature contemplated by the statute, they may not be held personally liable for their allegedly wrongful acts. Having so held, we need not decide whether these acts, involving the use of county funds to produce and disseminate a pamphlet supporting adoption of a charter form of government, constituted an illegal waste of public funds. This is particularly true where it is the county legislature which is given the initiatory responsibility with respect to the subject legislation.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG, concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Scheinert

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1979
392 N.E.2d 563 (N.Y. 1979)
Case details for

Stewart v. Scheinert

Case Details

Full title:JOHN T. STEWART et al., Appellants, v. JOEL L. SCHEINERT et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 31, 1979

Citations

392 N.E.2d 563 (N.Y. 1979)
392 N.E.2d 563
418 N.Y.S.2d 576

Citing Cases

Duffy v. Longo

But it is only when the waste or injury is by collusion or otherwise, or by the default in permitting a…

Murtha v. Incorporated Village of Island Park

Accordingly, the defendants were properly awarded summary judgment and the complaint was properly dismissed.…