From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Cruz

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jun 8, 2009
Civil No. 08-6085 (RHK/SRN) (D. Minn. Jun. 8, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-6085 (RHK/SRN).

June 8, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the May 4, 2009, Report and Recommendation (R R) of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson and Petitioner's Objections thereto. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the R R and Petitioner's Objections and is satisfied that Judge Nelson's recommended disposition is fully supported by the record before her and controlling legal authorities.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

1. Petitioner's Objections (Doc. No. 26) are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 25) is ADOPTED; and

3. The Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Cruz

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jun 8, 2009
Civil No. 08-6085 (RHK/SRN) (D. Minn. Jun. 8, 2009)
Case details for

Stewart v. Cruz

Case Details

Full title:Darrin Stewart, Petitioner, v. M. Cruz, Warden of FPC Duluth, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jun 8, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 08-6085 (RHK/SRN) (D. Minn. Jun. 8, 2009)

Citing Cases

Powell v. United States

Because a Court may consider the merits of a petition without considering exhaustion, and because Mr.…

Martinez v. Paul

The steps involve: "(1) determining when the sentence commenced; and (2) determining whether the defendant is…