From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Andrews

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Nov 7, 1917
35 Cal.App. 230 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917)

Opinion

Civ. No. 1925.

November 7, 1917.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granting a motion to set aside a judgment and permitting the filing of an amended complaint. Leslie R. Hewitt, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Willedd Andrews, in pro. per.

C. W. Hatton, and J. W. Barnes, for Respondent.


This is said to be an appeal from an order granting plaintiff's motion to set aside the judgment and granting permission to plaintiff to file an amended complaint. There is no record other than a typewritten transcript, which we may assume was prepared in accordance with section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. Appellant has not complied with section 953c of the Cole of Civil Procedure, which provides that upon such a record the parties must "print in their briefs, or in a supplement appended thereto, such portions of the record as they desire to call to the attention of the court." The brief for appellant is absolutely deficient in that it contains none of the evidence and contains no part of the record. On the authority of Jones v. American Potash Co., ante, p. 128, [ 169 P. 397], and cases there cited, the order is affirmed.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Andrews

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Nov 7, 1917
35 Cal.App. 230 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917)
Case details for

Stewart v. Andrews

Case Details

Full title:GERTIE STEWART, Respondent, v. WILLEDD ANDREWS, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District

Date published: Nov 7, 1917

Citations

35 Cal.App. 230 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917)
169 P. 397

Citing Cases

Blochman Etc. Bank v. Ketcham

Only a typewritten transcript on appeal has been filed. In such cases the rule is that we will assume that…

BARKER BROTHERS v. JOOS

( Jones v. American Potash Co., 35 Cal.App. 128, [ 169 P. 397]; Marcucci v. Vowinckel, 164 Cal. 693, [ 130 P.…