From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevens et Ux. v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 18, 1938
329 Pa. 496 (Pa. 1938)

Summary

In Stevens v. Pittsburgh, 329 Pa. 496, 198 A. 655, an action for the death of a boy killed while standing near his home by a bullet fired by a person in a public park, there had been long-continued, promiscuous shooting in the park — clearly a highly dangerous activity — and "the city had notice of the manner in which its property was being used and had opportunity to suppress the nuisance."

Summary of this case from Styer et al. v. Reading

Opinion

March 28, 1938.

April 18, 1938.

Before KEPHART, C. J., SCHAFFER, MAXEY, DREW, LINN, STERN and BARNES, JJ.

Appeal, No. 89, March T., 1938, from decree of Superior Court, April T., 1936, No. 95, affirming judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1930, No. 3483, in case of George P. Stevens et ux. v. City of Pittsburgh. Decree affirmed.

Trespass for wrongful death. Before GRAY, J.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court, reported in 129 Pa. Super. 5.

Verdict for plaintiffs in sum of $2,259.72. Judgment entered for defendant n. o. v. Plaintiffs appealed to the Superior Court, which reversed the judgment of the court below. Appeal by defendant to Supreme Court allowed.

Errors assigned were the action of the Superior Court in sustaining an assignment of error and in reversing the judgment for defendant.

Anne X. Alpern, First Assistant City Solicitor, with her Churchill Mehard, City Solicitor, for appellant.

A. H. Rosenberg, for appellee.


The decree of the Superior Court is affirmed on the opinion of Judge CUNNINGHAM.

Appellant is directed to pay the costs.


Summaries of

Stevens et Ux. v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 18, 1938
329 Pa. 496 (Pa. 1938)

In Stevens v. Pittsburgh, 329 Pa. 496, 198 A. 655, an action for the death of a boy killed while standing near his home by a bullet fired by a person in a public park, there had been long-continued, promiscuous shooting in the park — clearly a highly dangerous activity — and "the city had notice of the manner in which its property was being used and had opportunity to suppress the nuisance."

Summary of this case from Styer et al. v. Reading
Case details for

Stevens et Ux. v. Pittsburgh

Case Details

Full title:Stevens et ux. v. Pittsburgh, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 18, 1938

Citations

329 Pa. 496 (Pa. 1938)
198 A. 655

Citing Cases

Styer et al. v. Reading

However, it is well settled that in maintaining parks and playgrounds a city must exercise reasonable care:…

Healey v. City of Wilkes-Barre, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania

        ' * * * the maintenance of a public park is regarded as performance of a proprietary and not a…