From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steshenko v. McKay

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 13, 2014
552 F. App'x 721 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-17095 D.C. No. 5:09-cv-05543-RS

01-13-2014

GREGORY STESHENKO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THOMAS MCKAY, of the Cabrillo Community College; et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding

Before: TROTT, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Gregory Steshenko appeals pro se the district court's denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

The sole issue is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int'l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Steshenko v. McKay

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 13, 2014
552 F. App'x 721 (9th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Steshenko v. McKay

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY STESHENKO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THOMAS MCKAY, of the Cabrillo…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 13, 2014

Citations

552 F. App'x 721 (9th Cir. 2014)